Skip to main content

Rough & Tumble Spotlight by Mark Hatmaker

                                                                        "Big Jim"


In the grand ol’ crazy days of New York, competitive fire mustering was a thing.

Essentially it was whoever could get to a fire first would win the contract. Fires were frequent [as was a bit of serendipitous arson] and the competitions were not friendly.

Many fire departments recruited from less than savory elements to give the upper hand in jockeying for superior mustering position.

One such element was Jim Jeroloman, AKA “Big Jim.”

Big Jim was a 6’4” shipbuilder and boxer with earrings that dangled to shoulders—which he removed for musters.

Although a big man with what are described as heavy hands, he still relied on other tools of the rough and tumble trade—he was a noted biter.

Post one scuffle, his opponent complained of all the biting, once he peeled off his shirt over half a dozen bitemarks were found on his shoulders.

[Details on bite-targeting and unusual jaw-strengthening in upcoming RAWs.]

Big Jim complained that he would never go far in boxing because it denied him his best tools: biting, kicking, and eye-gouging.

We’ll discuss his compadre Orange County another day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.”
Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait.
We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear.
But there are a few accounts that mention how you can …

Kittens, Hoplites, & Combat Stances by Mark Hatmaker

Do you have a kitten?


If so, go play with it, dangle something in front of it, activate its play-fighting mode.

Watch it bat at the stand-in enemy with a forepaw.


If you don’t have a kitten, perhaps a dog?


Go play with it. Rile him up a bit and toss a toy on the ground watch him pin that toy with a forepaw and go to work with the jaws.


No dogs, no kittens in the house? How about a toddler?



If you have an 18-36-month-old human around the house go play with them. Roll a ball with them and watch them pick it up or roll it back.


No kitties, no dogs, no toddlers? Well, let’s have you try something.


While reading this, look around a pick up the nearest small object within your reach.


Now that we’ve all played with our pets, or our kids, or at the very least picked up a stapler or some such thing, we can repeat these activities and pay attention to the handedness of all entities.


The kitten will bat primarily with a dominant paw.


The dog will pin its mock-prey to the ground primarily with a domina…

The Dark Side of Man a Review by Mark Hatmaker

THE DARK SIDE OF MAN: Tracing the Origins of Male Violence-Michael P. Ghiglieri. I found this a deeply perceptive examination of the professed topic viewed through the lens of a physical anthropologist, who has both worked alongside Jane Goodall and been a soldier in some less than savory hot spots around the world. It seems this mix of field work, academic expertise, and real-world encounters with violence have given the author a perspective that stands outside both intellectual theorizing and, to be frank, some military thinking-Dave Grossman’s On Killing comes to mind. While that book, often recommended to me, is interesting reading there is something about his conclusions that always struck me as a bit too speculative-a bit too pat to compel me as completely true.
Ghiglieri’s work goes deeper than Grossman et al. Where these other authors seem to pin much on culture and acculturation to address violence issues, Ghiglieri (bravely, in my opinion) pushes the view to a macro level to…