Skip to main content

Fisticuffs by Mark Hatmaker

Fisticuffs, now there’s a word we’ve all heard. Conjures up images of old-timey bare-knucklers striking upright long-guard poses, while wearing tights and sporting waxed mustaches.

That image is exactly how the word has come to take its current form, as a synonym for boxing or an archaic word for a fistfight.

But...originally there was a bit more to it than that. To get to what that “more to it was” let’s first digress into the world of historical fashion.

Take a gander at woodcuts, paintings, lithographs or whatever medium moves you of the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries. Look not for depictions of various royals and courtiers lounging and feasting and dallying. Look to images of soldiers, look for images of the working class. I want you to look at, surprise, men’s cuffs.

With the middle-class and the aristocracy, you will find frilled cuffs, lace cuffs, loose billowy-cuffs. If you look hard enough at the lower and working classes you will see that these men, more often than not, sport short sleeves, and if they are sleeved there is greater likelihood of tighter cuffs.


Well, because they are working men and loose billowy fabric will get in the way of manual labor, and/or impair one’s safety when working with moving parts—mills, turnstiles, and the like.

If we continue our contemplation of men’s cuffs we may begin to notice these self-same working men sporting varieties of leather cuffs, brass bracelets, and in some cases two or three bangles on each wrist.

Now, when we see this are we seeing fashion or utility?

A little of both. Leather or metal cuffs were a standard part of wear in many cultures and many nations. We see them in American frontier Western wear in the form of leather “cowboy cuffs” which were worn to protect the arms against brush, winding rope, branding irons, and like hazards. Cowboy cuffs were essentially for the forearms what chaps were to the legs.

It was for these same protective reasons that we see leather and metal cuffs appear in other societies from Catalonian shepherds, to herders in Sicily, to whalers off The Great Banks, to archers in Burgundy. Protection.

But, just as with the shoes that protect our feet, we don’t mind a little dash or splash of fashion to make our kicks more palatable to the eye.

Cowboy cuffs often sport intricate designs. Leather wristbands often have gorgeous engravings or at least an ornamental buckle or two, and metal bracelets or bangles provide glints of becoming light in their reflection.

OK, utility and fashion. Got it.

But what does this have to do with hurting people?

Have a look at studded leather wristbands, the kind you might picture in your minds-eye of a stereotypical biker. Now time-machine that studded wristband backwards to the Five Points Gangs of the 19th-century.

Look at the metal bracelets of some mercenary soldiers in Old Spain.

Look at the bangles on images of Gypsies in caravan.

Fashion, utility, and, as it turns out, augmentation of the human weapon.

We’ve already mentioned wristbands as protection in one martial pursuit, while engaging in day-to-day archery, but we also have more than a few mentions of the wrist-protection being vital in the numerous blade cultures before the widespread use of personal firearms. We must not forget that knife and sword dueling was quite rampant. Protecting the quite vulnerable wrist was vital.

When one has a look at the studded wristbands of some Five Points gang members, the “toughs” of the waterfronts of New Orleans, well, everywhere life was lived roughly, it is no stretch of the imagination that in rough and tumble down and dirty fighting all was being used, and indeed it was.

The reinforced wrist became quite active both as a defensive weapon, and as a striking weapon, an often used one at that, as it was a hand-saver. Let’s also not underestimate what a well-studded, or well-buckled wristband might add to our clinch and grappling game where everything was in.

We have begun re-introducing “fisticuffs” in the original sense into our Raw Rough and Tumble program but even if we choose not to integrate this old school bit of meanness we can at least view the word and the once fashionable wristband, cowboy cuffs, and bangles with appreciative martial eyes.


Popular posts from this blog

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.”
Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait.
We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear.
But there are a few accounts that mention how you can …

Kittens, Hoplites, & Combat Stances by Mark Hatmaker

Do you have a kitten?

If so, go play with it, dangle something in front of it, activate its play-fighting mode.

Watch it bat at the stand-in enemy with a forepaw.

If you don’t have a kitten, perhaps a dog?

Go play with it. Rile him up a bit and toss a toy on the ground watch him pin that toy with a forepaw and go to work with the jaws.

No dogs, no kittens in the house? How about a toddler?

If you have an 18-36-month-old human around the house go play with them. Roll a ball with them and watch them pick it up or roll it back.

No kitties, no dogs, no toddlers? Well, let’s have you try something.

While reading this, look around a pick up the nearest small object within your reach.

Now that we’ve all played with our pets, or our kids, or at the very least picked up a stapler or some such thing, we can repeat these activities and pay attention to the handedness of all entities.

The kitten will bat primarily with a dominant paw.

The dog will pin its mock-prey to the ground primarily with a domina…

The Dark Side of Man a Review by Mark Hatmaker

THE DARK SIDE OF MAN: Tracing the Origins of Male Violence-Michael P. Ghiglieri. I found this a deeply perceptive examination of the professed topic viewed through the lens of a physical anthropologist, who has both worked alongside Jane Goodall and been a soldier in some less than savory hot spots around the world. It seems this mix of field work, academic expertise, and real-world encounters with violence have given the author a perspective that stands outside both intellectual theorizing and, to be frank, some military thinking-Dave Grossman’s On Killing comes to mind. While that book, often recommended to me, is interesting reading there is something about his conclusions that always struck me as a bit too speculative-a bit too pat to compel me as completely true.
Ghiglieri’s work goes deeper than Grossman et al. Where these other authors seem to pin much on culture and acculturation to address violence issues, Ghiglieri (bravely, in my opinion) pushes the view to a macro level to…