Skip to main content

Interrogating the Interrogator by Mark Hatmaker


Paul, thanks for taking the time to have this conversation. We’ve spoken before regarding one of your other lives as a Western author. Today I want to get into another area of your expertise, your skills as an expert interrogator. Would you mind giving the readers a little about your background?

I had a 35 year career with the Los Angeles Police Department. For over 20 years I investigated sex crimes, including 15 years running a Special Assaults Unit of thirty detectives covering 25% of the city for everything from indecent exposure to child molest to sexual homicide. Our unit regularly produced the highest number of detective initiated arrests and highest crime clearance rates in the city. I was fortunate to be twice honored as LAPD’s Detective of the Year and received the Quality and Productivity Commission Award from the City of Los Angeles. Through my company Elementrix Consulting (www.elementrixconslting.com), I currently conduct law enforcement seminars across the country and work with private companies faced with in-house data breaches, industrial espionage, or corporate sabotage.


With this wealth of experience in mind, what I want to hone in on is how we the common everyday Joe can see the world and our interactions with our fellow humans a bit more through your interrogator’s eyes. With that said, let me ask, have you found that your skills in the professional sense have had a bleed-over into your everyday personal interactions outside the job? If so, can you provide a few examples?


The harsh fact is everybody lies on average seven times a day. Most of these are small, white lies, which have become so automatic they no longer register. When was the last time you actually read all those Terms & Conditions? But I bet you regularly check the box saying you did. What husband hasn’t ducked for cover behind a lie when confronted with the question, Honey, do these pants make me look fat? These types of lies are relatively harmless. We accept them in stride, but they add up and provide us with the justification for larger lies.


As an expert in deception detection, I am acutely, empathically, aware of emotional bleed from everyone around me. I also pick up on tone and intonation like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard—not what is said, but the truth in the way it is said. If I called everyone in my private life on their lies, I’d have no friends left.


A core tenet of interaction is not simply being able to divine message, spoken and unspoken, but to put the person across from us at ease. What advice would you offer to the reader to better put the people we interact with every day in a better communication light? 

If I bring judgement into the interrogation room, the suspect is going to immediately sense it on a subconscious level. It’s hard to push judgement aside when we are dealing with people who are close to us, but it is necessary to the process. The same thing applies to personal agendas or blindly twisting the facts to fit a preconceived theory. Our natural tendencies to these behaviors has to be recognized and removed as barriers to communication.

To really communicate, we have to get out of the way of our ego. Are you consciously making the effort to listen to what somebody is saying, or are you just waiting fo your turn to talk? After you have listened to somebody consider paraphrasing back to them what you think they said. This shows the other person they have actually been heard, and allows for any corrections due to miscommunication.

Tangential question. You’ve been doing this for a long time and have a wealth of experience to draw from. It seems to my eye that the “Eyes down, phones in hand” culture is altering standards of communication a bit. Does your experience bear this out, or am I simply an old man grumbling?

I have long maintained if I put a twenty-something detective in a room with a suspect of the same approximate age and give them both phones, the interrogation could more easily be conducted via texts. Seriously, communication is a lost art. Verbal content is only 7% of communication. Gestures (58%) and tone/intonation (%35) make up the largest part of our communication skills. Both of these are lost in emails and texts (emoticons and shouting in capital letters don’t cut it).


A question to the core of what many want to hear. Are there specific tells that you look for to detect deceit? I understand these are not necessarily sure signs so people shouldn’t dissolve marriages over a simple interview, but is there a top handful of things you look for that signal, “Hmm, something is awry here”?

Everything I do as an interrogator is using anxiety to effect word choice (Is this about the stolen money?Is this about the missing money?), body language, timing, and gestures. I look for changes between how somebody behaves when I am asking non-anxiety raising questions (a baseline truth face) and what happens when I ask an anxiety raising question. If body language clenches, timing is suddenly filled with pauses (stalls) and questions repeated back (echoing), gestures become either tight or enlarged, words and phrases appear such as honestly or I swear on my mother’s grave (qualifiers—the truth doesn’t need to be qualified or dressed up), I’ve got a fairly good idea lies are flying. I look for clusters of these behaviors. One of these things by themselves means nothing, but if somebody is lying you will see and hear a number of these.


On the flip-side of things, are there a handful of signals you look for that demonstrate truthful behavior?


A person who has their torso turned to me, their arms low and hands open, and an irrefutable insistence on their innocence (the strength of a guilty person’s denials gets weaker…the strength of an innocent person’s denials always gets stronger—think about a time you were accused of something you didn’t do. Would you let anybody tell you that you did it?). If an innocent person is angry, they will be able to articulate a reasonable motive for their anger. A guilty person will not, Their anger is simply an act to control the interview/interrogation.


Are there specific tactics physical, or conversational that you find ideal to set interrogation moods?

How long do we have? My oft spoken mantra is: The success or failure of an interrogation is determined before the first question is asked...Try getting a room full of experienced detective to understand and accept that claim. Cops are all about show me, not tell me. I can show them, but it can take a while. However, I’ve never had anybody disagree with my statement by the end of a seminar. 

Are there surprising tells or quirks many of us [if not all] demonstrate day-to-day that we may not catch, but that strike you as “How do you not see this?” or “How do you not realize that you are doing this?”


All the time. My wife won’t let me watch reality based cop shows on TV like 48 Hours, because I end up yelling and throwing things at the screen because there is so much being done wrong. I’ve recently been researching the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald. This was arguably one of the most important interrogations in the history of the United States, if not the world, and it was totally, criminally, unbelievably screwed up from start to finish. All of this translates into the minutia of my everyday life.


Have you found the experienced immersion in interrogation has led to a sort of “Spidey-sense” in your daily life, where you sometimes get the “Hmm, something is a little off here” feeling before you are actually able to put your finger on what the “off” is? If so, could you provide an example?


Everybody has had the experience of taking either an instant dislike to somebody or an instant attraction. Our Spidey-sense is what makes the first three seconds of a job interview so important. You either get the job or you don’t in those three seconds, no matter how long the actual interview lasts.


In a controlled experiment based, a group of university students were asked to numerically rate the effectiveness based on an eight second lecture video clip, of ten different professors. At the end of the semester those ten professors were rated on the same numeric scale (1—10) by a different group of students who had taken their full classes. The compared results were almost perfectly matched.


In my case, I’m simply hyper aware consciously of this psychological response and try to understand it and moderate it.


In your opinion, does a knowledge of “deceitful” behavior allow one to better deceive? Or, are we simply prey to giving tells no matter the knowledge?


Those actions I view as deceitful are autonomic—physically and psychological self-governing behaviors which occur autonomously without an individual’s conscious effort. Attempts to consciously control these behaviors simply result in behaviors revealing those attempts at control. It can’t be done. Our bodies and our brain betray us every time. Watch professional poker players—they aren’t wearing big jackets, wide brim hats, sunglasses, and tons of bling to be cool. They are doing it to hide their autonomic responses as best they can.


What resources, besides your own work, would you point readers towards to have a better understanding of interrogation tactics or at least to better read communication?


What Every Body Is Saying by Joe Navarro and Telling Lies: The Clues To Deceit by Paul Ekman (whose work was the basis for the show Lie To Me) are both excellent standards in the field.


On the benign side of things, what advice would you give to the non-deceitful person who simply wants to be a better communicator?


Simple...Learn to listen.


Paul, thanks for taking the time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

A Conversation with Master Bladesman, James Keating by Mark Hatmaker

For those not in the know…
James Albert Keating: Master at Arms - Astonishingly good with all small weapons. A graduate of the ESI Bodyguard academy. A knife designer of note. A writer of poem, prose and storied tale. Four books to his name so far. Currently residing on a large Arabian horse ranch in the mountains of Oregon. Keating is the owner and operator of the Comtech Training Studio known worldwide as home to a vast array of fighters, fencers and fast guns. Keating has operated the training hall since 1972 when he first began teaching publicly. James Keating has trained in various combative systems since age 10. Just shy of being sixty years of hard work in the martial arts and tactical fields. His 2018 season of training seminars looks as strong as one of his hand made Bowie knives. His beliefs are as follows: "We advance together into the unknown future with the strength of our abilities sustaining us through thick and thin. Skill banishes fear. Skill is the secret, otherw…

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.”
Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait.
We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear.
But there are a few accounts that mention how you can …